My Jesus Mercy MinistriesInc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232743208
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Pleasant Mount, PA, USA
Phone
8664486279
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Protestant
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$54,437
Expenses
$163,131
Assets
$1,339,948
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Joseph A Grady (President & CEO)
  • Marykate Grady (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Joseph A Grady (President & CEO)
  • Marykate Grady (Vice President)
  • Edwin T WinterJrCPA (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

City of God building was renovated to be used as a Spiritual Chapel and apostolic spiritual learning center. It is also being used as a spiritual retreat house and pro-life center. Spiritual books, videos and tapes are also sold on a per order basis and in the gift shop. A new Chapel was built so that the Celebration of the Eucharist can be performed by a Catholic Priest. Permission has been granted by the Bishop of the Scranton Diocese for the use of this Chapel. Mary's Pavillion was erected so as to provide an open amphitheater for day-long and multiple day programs. The adjoining properties were purchased; Divine Mercy Farm to grow foods and raise livestock to provide food for the needy, and the nextdoor residence to house is being planned for future spiritual considerations.Ultimately, the goal is to spread God's Kingdom in the Words of our Lord Jesus Christ through his Divine Mercy for all.

What it reported doing in 2025

City of God building was renovated to be used as a Spiritual Chapel and apostolic spiritual learning center. It is also being used as a spiritual retreat house and pro-life center. Spiritual books, videos and tapes are also sold on a per order basis and in the gift shop. A new Chapel was built so that the Celebration of the Eucharist can be performed by a Catholic priest. Permission had been granted by the Bishop of the Scranton Diocese to designate this location as a National Shrine for the Divine Mercy. Mary's Pavillion was erected so as to provide an open amphitheater for day-long and multiple day programs. The adjoining properties were purchased; Divine Mercy Farm to grow organic foods and raise livestock to provide food for the needy and the nextdoor residence for future considerations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 41
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 68.1%; rating input score 68
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -199.7%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.21; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 68.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $111K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.