My Elf Dba Golden Sabre Academy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 471213847
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Fallbrook, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4429994939
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports Competitions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $142,100
- Expenses
- $25,348
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SERGEY KOBZAR (CEO)
People named in this filing
- SERGEY KOBZAR (CEO)
- MARINE MOGELADZE (Director)
- IRAKLI ALADASHVILI (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Golden Sabre Academy a non- profit organization helping children of all ages develop their full potential through extensive participation in olympic sport - fencing and healthy activities as an enjoyable part of daily life.
What it reported doing in 2022
Golden Sabre Academy a non- profit organization helped children of all ages develop their full potential through extensive participation in olympic sport - fencing and healthy activities as an enjoyable part of daily life.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 41
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 15.2%; rating input score 15
- Program expense ratio: 85.5%; rating input score 85
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 82.2%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 43.4%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -21.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 15.2% of revenue deployed · 85.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $22K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.