My Deen

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262191660
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2017
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2017
Location
Fresno, CA, USA
Phone
(559) TBD
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Islam
Affiliation
Islam

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$297,987
Expenses
$211,973
Assets
$1,166,836
Liabilities
$424,170

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHERAZ GILL (President/Treas)
  • IMTIAZ HAQ (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • AYAZ GILL (DIRECTOR)
  • MUSTAJEEB HASEEB (DIRECTOR)
  • SHERAZ GILL (President/Treas)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

MY DEEN envisions an American Muslim community that complements the larger American community by serving as a role model through exemplification of Islamic values; including Unity, Faith in the Creator (Allah), Honesty, Humility, and Integrity. _MY DEEN Mission_ MY DEEN develops and empowers the American Muslim community through innovative programs that build character, foster unity, and serve humanity. This mission statement is the recipe for achieving MY DEEN’s vision, and is further explained as follows:.

What it reported doing in 2017

My Deen empowers and develops the community through innovative programs that build character, foster unity and serve humanity.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 74% for direct work, and 26% for grants.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 19
  • Transparency & Controls: 77
  • Accountability: 0
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 18.2%; rating input score 18
  • Program expense ratio: 25.6%; rating input score 26
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 28.9%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.5; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 18.2% of revenue deployed · 25.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported · 0 of 6 affiliation controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $54K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.