My 360 Tribe Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933413788
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Roswell, GA, USA
Phone
4044581981
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Military, Veterans' Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$40,182
Expenses
$17,341
Assets
$47,902

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Brage Garofalo (Co-Founder/CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Scott McKee (Treasurer)
  • Michael Hudson (Co-Founder/Sec)
  • Brian Cunningham (Director/CFO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide programs and support services for special force military veterans and their families after their military service, and to help them transition to life back in normal society by connecting them with other special force veteran peers to assist in their transition period.

What it reported doing in 2024

For select employers, we offered full-cycle recruiting services that connected elite Special Operators talent with forward-thinking organizations nationwide, including full-cycle recruiting, maintaining an SOF talent pipeline, and custom talent matching. We also supported entrepreneurial operators with networking to organizations that can be customers, providing office supply support, training in specific fields, and other support and supplies. Furthermore, we assisted operators needing behavioral health support by offsetting expenses such as companion animals and treatments.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 56% for direct work, and 44% for grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 31
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 20.9%; rating input score 21
  • Program expense ratio: 48.5%; rating input score 48

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 56.8%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.76; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 20.9% of revenue deployed · 48.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.