Mx Servelead International

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
833765975
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-T 2025
Location
Monterey Park, CA, USA
Phone
6262676124
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$120,574
Expenses
$103,003
Assets
$212,452
Liabilities
$1,395

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIEL YAHUNG SHER (President)

People named in this filing

  • DANIEL YAHUNG SHER (President)
  • YICHUNG CHUNG (Secretary)
  • MING-TSENG FANG (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Mission of MX ServeLead International is to provide Christian leadership development related ministries, such as training, mentoring, and research to pastoral and missionary leaders among Christian churches and organizations in order to enhance their leadership capabilities to serve and lead. By doing so, the churches and organizations may be able to assist the proclamation of the gospel of Jesus Christ better.

What it reported doing in 2025

A. Conducting leadership development seminars to churches and Christina organization.B. Leading 8 cohorts of Leadership Development routinely throughout the year.C. Providing leadership consultation to Christian organizations.D. Leading a pastoral retreat on pastoral leadership.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14.6%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.06; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 75.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 25.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.