MVP Health Care
Legal name: Mvp Health Plan Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 141640868
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Schenectady, NY, USA
- Phone
- 1-800-TALK-MVP (18008255687)
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,163,426,147
- Expenses
- $3,171,157,047
- Assets
- $875,342,477
- Liabilities
- $427,366,608
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTOPHER DEL VECCHIO (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRISTOPHER DEL VECCHIO (PRESIDENT & CEO): $2,295,625 total reported compensation
- KARLA AUSTEN (CFO/TREASURER): $828,124 total reported compensation
- DOMINICK BIZZARRO (CHIEF GROWTH OFFICER (THRU 06/24)): $733,627 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
MVP Health Care strives to shift the model from sick care to well care and provide personalized support and trusted guidance to meet customers wherever they are on their health care journey. At MVP, our mission is powered by a passionate workforce dedicated to our core values: _Be the difference for the customer. Be curious. Be humble._ We ask what’s working, what’s missing, and what more we can do. Above all, we lead with humility. Because it’s not about us; it’s about those we serve. This includes the greater communities we call home. TeamMVP proudly supports local non-profit organizations through our Service Time Off program, as well as via grant funding and sponsorships. Consistently recognized as a top workplace, our team shows up every day ready to help build healthier, more vibrant communities across our footprint. Learn More Our Community Legacy.
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule o
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.5%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 92.2%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 62%; rating input score 62; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.2%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.49; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.3%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 92.5% of revenue deployed · 92.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.9B in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.3M · 25 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $11.2M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 49 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 42 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.