Mustangs Boosters Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 522172182
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016
- Location
- Bel Air, MD, USA
- Phone
- 7407778941
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $19,169
- Expenses
- $29,453
- Assets
- $4,512
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Christopher Lorenzo (President)
- Ed Walter (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Christopher Lorenzo (President)
- Kevin Hilbourn (Treasurer)
- Janine Meadows (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Mustangs Boosters, Inc. promotes and supports athletics at C. Milton Wright High School, Harford County, Maryland. The Boosters' mission is to support, encourage and enhance the athletic program and students at C. Milton Wright High School through physical and financial means and to promote participation and sportsmanship through quality competitions. The Boosters contribute to the C. Milton Wright High School Interscholastic Athletic Program and Physical Education Program so that students and coaches reap the maximum benefit both athletically and academically, the facilities are safe and well maintained, and the equipment used is state of the art. C Milton Wright High School is one of 53 schools in the Harford County Public School System.
What it reported doing in 2016
During the year ended June 30, 2017, the Mustangs Boosters, Inc. conducted concession stand sales at sporting events held at C. Milton Wright High School, sold school spirit merchandise, and held a spaghetti dinner and golf outing. The funds raised by these special events were utilized to provide assistance to the various varsity and junior varsity sports teams.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 77.6%; rating input score 78
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -53.6%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10.1% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -22% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 77.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2011 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.