Muslim Ummah Cemetery
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920298466
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jun 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Bolingbrook, IL, USA
- Phone
- 6306707997
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Cemeteries
- Affiliation
- Islam
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $388,578
- Expenses
- $270,387
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MOHAMMAD AWAIS CHAUDHRY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MOHAMMAD AWAIS CHAUDHRY (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
At nbsp; the nbsp; mut nbsp; is nbsp; to nbsp; provide nbsp; dignified nbsp; and nbsp; respectful nbsp; burial nbsp; services nbsp; in nbsp; accordance nbsp; with nbsp; islamic nbsp; principles nbsp; and nbsp; economically nbsp; feasible nbsp; we nbsp; are nbsp; committed nbsp; to nbsp; maintaining nbsp; well-maintained nbsp; grounds nbsp; that nbsp; serve nbsp; as nbsp; a nbsp; sacred nbsp; final nbsp; restingplace nbsp; for nbsp; muslims
What it reported doing in 2024
Burial services
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.8%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 97.4%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 75%; rating input score 75; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 30.4%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 162.3% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 67.8% of revenue deployed · 97.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 7 filing controls reported · 0 of 6 affiliation controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $271K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 11 of 14 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX AllOtherExpenses column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX OfficeExpenses column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.