Muslim Community Link
Legal name: Muslim Community Link Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 810840289
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2020
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Worcester, MA, USA
- Phone
- (774) 314-7625
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
- Affiliation
- Islam
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $96,961
- Expenses
- $76,676
- Assets
- $33,088
- Liabilities
- $1,802
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- IMRANA A SOOFI (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- AMANE ABDELJABER (SECRETARY)
- IMRANA A SOOFI (PRESIDENT)
- MOHAMMAD SHAHBAZ ALI SOOFI (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To foster positive interactions and advance community integration by providing quality educational, wellness and referral services for all members, inclusive of the most marginalized within the Muslim Community.
What it reported doing in 2020
Black seed farmers market
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 22
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 20%; rating input score 20
- Program expense ratio: 25.3%; rating input score 25
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.9%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 50% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 20% of revenue deployed · 25.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 6 affiliation controls reported
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $19K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2016 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.