Muslim Alliance of Indiana Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202397185
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Phone
3174431959
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Intergroup, Race Relations
Affiliation
Islam

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,337
Expenses
$7,863
Assets
$31,696
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Maryam Qureshi (President)
  • Aliya Amin (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Fatima Hussain (Director)
  • Ibrahim Alghani (Director)
  • Ismail Abdul Aleem (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to inspire Muslim Hoosiers to connect through service and civic engagements in their communities. Our vision is to see Muslim Hoosiers actively involved in their community, helping to build a diverse and vibrant state characterized by strong social justice

What it reported doing in 2022

We continually strive to develop programming in pursuit of social justice for all Hoosiers. We believe that an engaged and active Muslim community is the key to dispelling fear and misunderstanding Islam. We seek out interfaith partnerships to strengthen our relationship with other religious communities throughout Indianapolis. We understand that to see our vision turn into reality, we must provide opportunities for leadership among both Muslim women and Muslim youth. We continually work to assure a place for the Muslim voice in public dialogue.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 73
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 23.9%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.03; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -23.1% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2016 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.