Muskingum Valley Health Centers
Legal name: Muskingum Valley Health Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208814374
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Zanesville, OH, US
- Phone
- 1-888-454-5157
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $61,685,470
- Expenses
- $60,858,614
- Assets
- $60,686,117
- Liabilities
- $19,789,691
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Daniel Atkinson (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Paul Wright (Physician): $630,124 total reported compensation
- Joseph Binkiewicz (Physician): $552,792 total reported compensation
- Jeff Downing (Physician): $478,069 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide quality, affordable healthcare to everyone in the communities we serve.
What it reported doing in 2024
Muskingum valley health center provides numerous services, including adult primary care, urgent care, pediatrics, dental, mental health, ob/gyn, and podiatry services. The three largest service programs are adult primary care, urgent care, and pediatrics. During the year, the center provided services for approximately 73,803 patients resulting in 282,657 visits, and provided a sliding fee scale adjustment in the amount of $2,684,734. Muskingum valley health centers performs contract services for other organizations and participates in activities that generate additional funding sources related to their mission.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 87% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 76.5%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.3%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.33; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.5%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 10 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 4 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 76% of revenue deployed · 76.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $47.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $630K · 19 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.7M reported
- Consistency: 47 of 47 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.