Muskingum Recreation Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273457993
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Athens, OH, USA
- Phone
- 7405932555
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Recreational Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,250,910
- Expenses
- $1,106,163
- Assets
- $10,076,429
- Liabilities
- $143,148
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
People named in this filing
- JAROD ANDERSON (FORMER TRUST)
- EDWARD BOHREN (TRUSTEE)
- KARLA FRYE (FORMER TRUST)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Dedicated to providing residents and visitors a safe, clean, and well maintained facility that promotes health, education, and recreation through a network of quality programs, activities, and amenities.
What it reported doing in 2019
Promotes health and wellness through recreational, fitness, and educational programming to a multi-generational population from infants to older adults.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 98% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 20
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 96
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 4.5%; rating input score 5
- Program expense ratio: 52%; rating input score 52
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 91%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.11; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 33.3% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 4.5% of revenue deployed · 52% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $575K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and related organizations
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2012 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.