Muskegon County Amateur Hockey Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
382801972
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Muskegon, MI, USA
Phone
2317399423
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Winter Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$180,605
Expenses
$204,702
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAN TURCOTT (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN BRAUN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAN TURCOTT (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • TRICIA KERRIDGE (TREASURER)
  • CHRIS PASTOTNIK (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide youth with a recreational amateur hockey development program implements thru skill development and competition. Mcaha recognizes a broad range of ability and commitment. Promotes participation in the sport of ice hockey thru the process of instruction and team competition.

What it reported doing in 2015

Recreational amateur hockey development program implements through skilll development and competition. Mcaha recognizes a broad range of ability and commitment amoung its participants and strives to provide appropriate instruction and competition within the constraints of cost and ice time. Mcaha does not discriminate on the basis of gender, race, national origin or religious affiliations and seeks to place youths (boys and girls) with similar desires and judged abilities together on teams or in similar groups to maximize enjoyment for all participants.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 18
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 12
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 19.1%; rating input score 19
  • Program expense ratio: 16.8%; rating input score 17

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -13.3%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 19.1% of revenue deployed · 16.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $34K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2009 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 19/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.