Music Teachers National Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 346555054
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-T 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Johnstown, OH, USA
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $39,228
- Expenses
- $35,165
- Assets
- $138,809
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Andrew Villemez (President)
- Susan Treer (Immediate Past President)
- Olga Rua (President Elect)
- Ashley Wise (Vice President)
- Annette Hooverman (Vice President)
- Lizbeth Atkinson (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Andrew Villemez (President)
- Susan Treer (Immediate Past President)
- Olga Rua (President Elect)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Ohio Music Teachers Association aims to enhance the importance of music education and performance in society. It supports its member teachers professionally offering various student development opportunities like recitals festivals and master classes. The OhioMTA fosters teachers professional growth through programs and workshops at State and National Conferences.
What it reported doing in 2025
Ohio Music Teachers Association provides both State and National Competition opportunities open to music students across the state of Ohio. Buckeye Auditions had 84 elementary junior and senior level students across eight districts. The top winners in each district went on to compete at a State Buckeye Audition. 6 students were selected by a panel of judges and received prizes funded by member support.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 44
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 41.6%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 46.5%; rating input score 46
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.4%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.95; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 41.6% of revenue deployed · 46.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $16K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.