Museum of Science & Industry Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
592657399
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Tampa, FL, USA
Phone
8139876300
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Museum, Museum Activities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,613,855
Expenses
$4,625,060
Assets
$6,212,679
Liabilities
$1,001,061

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN GRAYDON SMITH (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOHN GRAYDON SMITH (PRESIDENT/CEO): $315,401 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Serve the public as a community-based institution and educational resource that is dedicated to advancing public interest, knowledge and understanding of science, industry and technology.

What it reported doing in 2024

In fy2025, mosi continued to offer diverse steam exhibits, including mission moonbase, saunders planetarium, and interactive sports science exhibits like slippery science, a collaboration with the tampa bay lightning. Mosi focused on refurbishing exhibits and creating and adding new permanent exhibits such as dino-dig, history of flight aviation maze, and drone zone. (see schedule o for continuation)this major enhancement, made possible through community and foundation support, positioned mosi as home to one of the largest and most advanced digital domes in the united states. The new theatre opened to the public on april 1, 2025, with a ribbon-cutting ceremony attended by retired nasa astronaut nicole stott and the first hillsborough county student field trip to experience the dome's live astronomy programming. The 8k digital dome theatre now offers daily planetarium shows, immersive full-dome films, and laser light experiences, increasing both mosi's educational capacity and earned-revenue potential through new ticketed evening programs.throughout the fiscal year, mosi also presented several major traveling and special exhibitions. In january 2025, the museum opened dinosaur discoveries, which explored paleontology and biomechanics to reveal how dinosaurs moved and lived, along with the nikon small world photomicrography exhibit, which celebrated the beauty of science through award-winning microscopic photography. Due to high visitor demand, the popular grossology: the (impolite) science of the human body exhibition was extended through the end of april 2025. In march 2025, mosi launched the space for art exhibit, created in partnership with astronaut nicole stott and nasa's space for art foundation, highlighting the intersection of art, healing, and space exploration. In may 2025, mosi premiered giants, dragons & unicorns: the world of mythic creatures, organized by the american museum of natural history, which explored the scientific and cultural origins of legendary beings. Later in the year, the museum introduced artificial intelligence: your mind and the machine, an interactive experience that invited guests to explore how ai is shaping modern life and the future of innovation.in addition to these traveling and temporary exhibitions, mosi maintained and refreshed several key permanent installations, including mission moonbase, idea zone makerspace, drone zone flight school, dino-dig, and the art factory. Each of these spaces continued to provide visitors with hands-on opportunities to explore science and technology through creativity, design, and experimentation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.3%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 80.3%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $12.65 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.6%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.34; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.8%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -10.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.3% of revenue deployed · 80.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $315K · 15 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $1.4M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 45/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.