Museum of Contemporary Art Cleveland
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 341148828
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Cleveland, OH, USA
- Phone
- 2164218671
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Visual Arts Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,978,127
- Expenses
- $3,606,176
- Assets
- $23,315,957
- Liabilities
- $274,953
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
29 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHEN G SOKANY (PRESIDENT)
- MARCELLA BROWN (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- MEGAN L LYKINS REICH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MEGAN L LYKINS REICH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $188,415 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Moca's mission- art now, in progress - embodies our nature as a living, adaptive platform for artistic experimentation, public exchange, and civic connection. Our vision - artists & art lead us to the unfamiliar, where we open and connect to new possibilities - is both regularly achievable and persistently aspiring. Artists and audiences are jointly central to our work, partners with us in using art now for inquiry, expression, dialogue, interpretation, and application beyond our walls and into the world.
What it reported doing in 2024
Founded in 1968 by marjorie talalay, nina sundell, and agnes gund as the new gallery, moca was established to introduce cleveland audiences to emerging and experimental contemporary art. Over nearly six decades, the organization has evolved into a nationally recognized, non-collecting contemporary art museum, presenting and commissioning new and recent work by more than 4,000 artists and engaging millions of audience members through exhibitions, programs, communications, and outreach. Since opening its university circle building in 2012, moca has served as a key cultural anchor within one of cleveland's most active cultural, educational, and healthcare neighborhoods.in early fy25, moca articulated three impact objectives to align with our updated mission, vision, and values and to express the consistent goals that guide our work across fiscal years. Their definitions describe both what moca does and the outcomes we seek to achieve. Against these objectives, we establish specific metrics to measure success, identify opportunities for improvement, and strengthen areas of impact. Our exhibitions, engagement initiatives, special events, partnerships, strategic communications, and outreach efforts are how we pursue these goals. Together, these objectives guided moca's work throughout 2025 and defined the outcomes of our efforts:1. Pursue the "whys" of our shared world: create opportunities for mutual exploration and productive exchange in order to foster new connections, increase cognitive flexibility and learning agility, and uplift our collective humanity.key 2025 initiatives included more than 20 moca saturday workshops, developed with partners such as designexplorr and stem-focused high schools, that supported hands-on creativity for families. Moca also delivered 15 off-site programs in schools and community centers, including collaborative youth projects with the center for arts-inspired learning's teen council. Partnerships with organizations such as linking employment, abilities and potential (leap) and the cuyahoga county board of developmental disabilities supported the co-creation of inclusive programs, including sensory sundays and paid internships for individuals with disabilities. In addition, moca piloted wheels of wonder at university hospitals rainbow babies & children's hospital, providing hands-on art experiences and museum access for immunocompromised children and their families.2. Push the boundaries of artistic excellence: advance experimentation by artists and audiences in order to strengthen the capacity for innovation and creative problem solving, expand concepts of quality and meaning, and model strong imagination for change.highlights from 2025 included dear, an exhibition co-presented with birthing beautiful communities that celebrated the role of doulas in advancing health equity. Moca presented solo exhibitions by harminder judgehis first us museum exhibitionand gala porras-kim, mounted shortly after her heinz award recognition and before her subsequent designation as both a us artists fellow and macarthur fellow. The museum also presented kelli connell's double life, developed in partnership with progressive, which explored identity and selfhood through more than two decades of collaboration with a single model. In partnership with progressive, moca additionally hosted the public debut of beverly semmes' monumental installation the dresses. Summer exhibitions by clotilde jimnez and erykah townsendboth artists' first museum exhibitionsfeatured new commissions and nationally debuting works. Jimnez's project will continue beyond the exhibition through the grotto, an experimental opera that moca will present in partnership with a leading music organization in 2027. Finally, maggie menghan chen's body building exercise combined performance, spirituality, and the connective power of digital culture to create an audience-interactive artwork centered on optimism, solidarity, and joy. Presented for the first ti
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 59%; rating input score 59
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -82.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.47; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.2%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.9% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 59% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 28 of 28 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $188K · 29 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 5/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 53/100.