Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521042433
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
202-838-1330
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$64,107,674
Expenses
$49,653,681
Assets
$97,493,666
Liabilities
$15,634,015

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

36 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARK T KIM (PRESIDENT AND CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARK T KIM (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $892,935 total reported compensation
  • JOHN A BAGLEY (CHIEF MARKET STRUCTURE OFFICER): $630,927 total reported compensation
  • ERNESTO LANZA (CHIEF REGULATORY & POLICY OFFICER): $573,427 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The MSRB protects investors, issuers, and the public interest by promoting a fair and efficient municipal securities market.

What it reported doing in 2024

Market regulation: msrb was established by congress to regulate securities firms, banks and municipal advisors that transact in municipal securities and engage in municipal advisory activities (collectively "regulated entities") with the goal of protecting investors, municipal entities, obligated persons, and the public interest. (continued on schedule o)msrb works to protect investors and issuers by creating fair, clear, and effective rules for the municipal securities market. Its goal is to make the market stronger and more competitive by leveling the playing field for market participants and promoting capital formation. Msrb's regulatory accomplishments in fiscal year (fy) 2025 include:-trade reporting: msrb rescinded the not yet effective amendments to rule g-14 requiring trades to be reported within one minute. Msrb retained the current 15-minute reporting standard after discussion with market participants but amended the rule to require dealers, beginning in july 2026, to report trades "as soon as practicable and have clear policies in place to meet this new requirement.-msrb also maintained its focus on retrospective rule reviews to ensure its rules are achieving their intended purposes and don't create unnecessary burdens. Msrb launched five major reviews of existing rules:-adapting dealer supervision rules to the modern workplace (rule g-27)-streamlining the primary market disclosure and data submission process (rule g-32 and rule g-34)-updating municipal advisor rules; and-modernizing disclosure and other obligations for municipal fund securities

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.5%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.96; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.4%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $893K · 36 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $8M reported
  • Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 36 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.