Municipal Analysts Group of Ny

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133132753
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
White Plains, NY, USA
Phone
9143913537
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$60,019
Expenses
$94,801
Assets
$29,386
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • LEONARD JONES (CHAIRPERSON)
  • TIFFANY TRIBBITT (TREASURER)
  • ANNE ROSS (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The municipal analysts group of New York (magny) is an association of securities analysts based in the greater New York city metropolitan area, including portions of New Jersey and Connecticut, who specialize in evaluating the credit worthiness of municipal securities. Magny has mirrored the steady growth of the municipal finance industry as a whole and has evolved into a large educational mission as its core organizational goal.

What it reported doing in 2025

To provide a forum to exchange ideas and to analyze a wide range of timely topics important to the profession, magny organized periodic luncheon meetings throughout the year featuring prominent figures in the municipal finance industry as well as member analysts themselves. These panels are typically held on a monthly basis, although the schedule may vary and due to the pandemic have been provided virtually. Magny's forum luncheons have served an extremely useful role in providing convenient means to evaluate issues of common concern and to deepen the knowledge and awareness of its members with respect to timely issues and topics. These luncheons are of industry wide significance and are open to all municipal finance professionals. Individuals whose professional work is devoted to municipal credit analysis and aligned areas are encouraged to join magny.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 62% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -58%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.