Mumas Renaciendo Corp

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
660875611
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Hatillo, PR, USA
Phone
7872258723
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,594
Expenses
$7,689
Assets
$12,664
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MILI LANDRON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LILLIAN K ALVARADO (DIRECTOR)
  • MILI LANDRON (PRESIDENT)
  • KARLA LOPEZ (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Empowerment and business workshops for ladies

What it reported doing in 2025

It has managed to impact over three hundred women from different communities in the north of the country in an event for the entire community of women, offering motivational and business talks. Achieving the support of specialized resources, companies, public and private agencies for the success of the initiative. In addition to offering different training to women and mothers of limited economic resources with groups of 15 participants in each of the workshops aimed at self-esteem, projection, innovation, entrepreneurship, product manufacturing, self-management, events for on-the-job training, exposing the product made by each of the participants and recreational activities with purpose.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.9%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.65; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -30.7% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -8.9% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.