Mulvane Rodeo Arena Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
455191005
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Mulvane, KS, USA
Phone
3167770818
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal-Related N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$87,996
Expenses
$63,260
Assets
$191,335
Liabilities
$30,932

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JACKIE MCCOLPIN (PRESIDENT)
  • TERRY LANE (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JACKIE MCCOLPIN (PRESIDENT)
  • TERRY LANE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SHELLY IGO (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A. Conduct and sponsor horse sports and events for the city of mulvane, ks and surrounding community.b. Provide education and training to the community regarding equestrian sports, handling and care, and safety.c. Conduct and support charitable programs which advance the teaching and appreciation of equestrian sports and safety.d. Promote such other charitable and educational endeavors as may be permitted under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended ("code"), or (ii) by a corporation, contributions to which are deductible under section 170(c)(2) of the code.

What it reported doing in 2025

Each year the organization makes its facilities available to the community for various equestrian programs, a rodeo, etc. That coincides with the "old settler's day" festival hosted by the mulvane community. All monies earned from these events are used to further the organizations exempt purpose.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 61% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.7%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 28.1%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.02; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $70K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.