Multipolai Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
923564037
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
New Rochelle, NY, USA
Phone
9142166163
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Engineering and Technology

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,673
Expenses
$12,846
Assets
$237,106
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Danit Gal (Director and President)

People named in this filing

  • Danit Gal (Director and President)
  • Steve Omohundro (Director)
  • Chelsea Sun (Director and Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

MULTIPOLAI SOCIETY strives to benefit humanity by safeguarding and promoting the development and regulation of artificial intelligence in the public interest. MULTIPOLAI SOCIETY strives to support and empower civil servants and academic institutions to identify and pursue informed and effective engagements in areas concerning critical public safety threats posed by the use and abuse of Artificial Intelligence.

What it reported doing in 2025

Funded in 2025. Artificial Intelligence in Disaster Prevention, Management, and Recovery: Mapping existing solutions and applications of Artificial Intelligence models and systems for disaster preparedness, prevention, management, and recovery. Identifying gaps in design, safe and secure execution, and successful termination and modeling effective solutions. Making significant contributions and practical recommendations to improving and enhancing existing best practices, and making this information more easily accessible to a wide variety of stakeholders. Understanding, highlighting, and addressing the risks of Artificial Intelligence use/abuse to aggravate, take advantage of, and create existing and new disasters. Conducted international AI-driven disaster prevention research and regional safety protocol development. Conducted AI-driven disaster prevention research and regional safety protocol development in Fukuoka, Japan. Established a physical research presence and navigated complex international regulatory requirements to maintain operations for ongoing data collection.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -92.5%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 18.46; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -189.4% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.