Multi-Service Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237120815
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Federal Way, WA, US
- Phone
- 253-815-4600
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $28,313,288
- Expenses
- $26,123,591
- Assets
- $32,046,119
- Liabilities
- $20,940,540
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID MCRAE (PRESIDENT)
- TELEDA HOMES (VICE PRESIDENT)
- KIRSTEN YORK (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- KIRSTEN YORK (CEO): $232,507 total reported compensation
- AMANDA SANTO (COO): $188,531 total reported compensation
- NANCY SCHNEIDER (HR DIRECTOR): $155,923 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Multi-Service Center is a community action nonprofit dedicated to helping people meet their basic needs and build stability through compassionate, culturally responsive services.
What it reported doing in 2024
Economic stability msc's economic opportunity program provides resources for housing, education, and employment. Housing assistance includes permanent, transitional, and emergency housing for individuals. Housing services: - william j wood veterans house. 48 households were served in permanent housing with supportive services at the william j wood veterans house. Of the 9 exiting households, 66% exited to other permanent housing. Out of 40 households who have completed at least 2 self-sufficiency matrix assessments, 87% improved in one or more life domains. Life domains in the analysis include housing, income/benefits, mental health, legal, mobility, and community. Staff met with program participants, asking detailed questions to understand how program participants respond and assess their self-sufficiency as a result of their own resiliency and staff support. - burien veterans house. 17 individuals were served at the burien vets house. Of the 12 exiting individuals, 66% exited to permanent housing and 8% moved on to other temporary housing situations. Out of 5 residents who completed at least 2 self-sufficiency matrix assessments, 60% improved in one or more life domains. Life domains in the analysis include housing, income/benefits/employment, mental health, legal, mobility, and substance use. Staff met with program participants, asking detailed questions to understand how program participants respond and assess their self-sufficiency as a result of their own resiliency and staff support. - titusville station. 18 households were served at titusville sro and e side apartments. Of the 4 exiting households, 75% exited to permanent housing. Titusville has been undergoing building updates and a kitchen remodel to create a more safe and supportive place for residents to work on their recovery and foundation building. - shelter. 21 households received shelter services through msc. Of the 7 exiting households, 43% exited to permanent housing and 14% exited to other temporary housing situations. Out of 3 households who have completed at least 2 self-sufficiency matrix assessments, 66% improved in one or more life domains. Life domains in the analysis include housing, income/benefits/employment, mental health, legal, children's education, and community. Staff met with program participants, asking detailed questions to understand how program participants respond and assess their self-sufficiency as a result of their own resiliency and staffsupport. - regional access point (rap). 32 households were served with diversion assistance during this time and as a result, placed into permanent housing. The rap team conducts outreach in 4 south king county cities at community centers, day centers, and libraries. During the reporting timeframe, the rap team completed the housing triage tool with 317 households. - veteran navigation program. 14 households were served in a new veteran navigation program which began serving customers in march 2025. The program provides housing navigation and related support services to veteran households experiencing housing instability and homelessness. Of the 2 exiting households, 100% obtained permanent housing. Several other households were able to maintain their current housing and/or achieve other goals. Community navigation: during this reporting period, 92 households and 245 individuals received assistance with their inquiries regarding both msc and other external programs. In this reporting period, 48% of the individuals served identified specifically as hispanic and 87% of the total individuals served identified as a racial category other than white. Rental & emergency assistance: emergency assistance support 680 individuals / 279 households received emergency assistance support from msc staff, including 255 rental assistance payments. 12 households were served with other types of emergency services, such as utility assistance payments and motel vouchers. Employment and education: - open doors out of 24 ex
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 46% for direct work, and 54% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.3%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 85.9%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $46.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.7%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.23; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.65; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.4%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 79.3% of revenue deployed · 85.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $22.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $233K · 24 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.3M reported
- Consistency: 37 of 38 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 18 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 24 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.