Mulligan Animal Rescue Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463126031
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Mount Royal, NJ, USA
Phone
6093158887
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Reported finances

Revenue
$22,088
Expenses
$19,011
Assets
$3,077

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNIFER GUETENS (PRESIDENT)
  • MARYANN SMITH (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JENNIFER GUETENS (PRESIDENT)
  • MARYANN SMITH (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SHERYL MIDDLETON (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Rescue animals that would not otherwise be given a chance

What it reported doing in 2024

Mulligan animal rescue, a 501 (c) (3) non-profit organization, consists of a group of dedicated , loving women, who believe in making a positive difference. We work strictly from our homes - we are not a shelter. Allof the animals entrusted to our care receive individualized attention from our families and our furry and non-furry children. Every animalis seen by our specialist vet who has extensive experience in emergency and critical care medicine. Each animal is given qaccess to a specialist and provided with any recommended diagnostic and surgical treatment. Every animal gets fully vetted and spayed/neutered prior to adoption. Mulligan animal rescue is deeply passioanteregarding specialneeds from the moment they arrive. We focus on animals with disabilities who cannot hear, see, have deformitoies, etc. We strive to educate and reach a solution to abandoned, animals

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.9%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 45.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.