Muhsen
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473187591
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2016
- Location
- Naperville, IL, USA
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,305,007
- Expenses
- $2,353,276
- Assets
- $5,296,369
- Liabilities
- $239,790
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Joohi Tahir (Executive Dir.): $120,496 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Muslim communities where individuals with disabilities and their families are welcomed, supported, and included across the span of their lifetime.
What it reported doing in 2024
Services have begun all over the country re: Disability access and community member support groups for care-givers Special Needs Classes have started at 26 weekend schools- inclusion and 1:1 special education Regional Chapters are established - AZ, CA, IL, MI, NJ, TX Events, classes, fairs and talks and dinners in the community are providing services to be "Special Friendly" with childcare/adult care, assistance and accommodations Fulfilling requests for ASL - Sign Language interpreters at events as requested National Convention services consistently year-round Masjid Certification Program in progress at multiple locations
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 50
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 47.5%; rating input score 48
- Program expense ratio: 57.4%; rating input score 57
- Fundraising efficiency: $17.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28.8%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.25; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.1%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 26.3% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 25.9% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 29.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 47.5% of revenue deployed · 57.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 9 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported · 5 of 6 affiliation controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $120K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 53/100.