Mu Alpha Pmd Alumni Assoc Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
844474506
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Thornton, PA, USA
Phone
6104054729
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alumni Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$33,193
Expenses
$47,278
Assets
$288,848
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TEAGUE A EMERY (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • GENE CAUTILLO JR (DIRECTOR)
  • KEN SALZMAN (DIRECTOR)
  • TEAGUE A EMERY (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

For pleasure and recreation and other nonprofitable purposes and activities; to promote lasting and enduring friendships among its members; to foster high standard of intellectual achievement and ethical behavior among its members; to promote the education of its members and to promote the education and social milieu of the college where the mu alpha chapter is established; to promote the development of education and advancement in the life of its members and promote and forster the fraternal principles and ideals of phi mu delta fraternity; to acquire, purchase, sell, occupy, erect, maintain, hold, own and lease such personal or real property as may be necessary or desirable to carrying out any of the foregoing purposes; and to assist with order and approve any and all repairs and improvements on property leased to mu alpha chapter of phi mu delta. Serves as the parent company of alpha sigma omega assocation, the title holding company.

What it reported doing in 2024

Alumni board expenses for the monitoring, guidance and counsel of the mu alpha chapter of phi mu delta fraternity of susquehanna university, selinsgrove, pa and maintaining communications with the alumni members. During fiscal year ended june 30, 2025, the alumni board contributed $5646 to susquehanna unversity for the phi mu delta - mu alpha scholarship fund for undergraduate brothers. Income from the fund is to be awarded annually as a scholarship to an active phi mu delta brother student in good standing who demonstrates financial need.

Operating model

Revenue model
Affiliate-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 79% for direct work, and 21% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 87.1%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 65.3%; rating input score 65; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -42.4%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.11; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 26.7% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -10.8% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 87.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $41K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.