Mt Spokane Wildcats Athletic Booster Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911826408
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Mead, WA, USA
- Phone
- 5098635030
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $55,716
- Expenses
- $63,316
- Assets
- $43,748
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KELLI SCHUERMAN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KELLI SCHUERMAN (PRESIDENT)
- KRISTA SHAW (VICE PRESIDE)
- ABBY MARCY (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support, promote, and encourage the growth and development of athletics and activities for mt. Spokane high school.
What it reported doing in 2024
The mt. Spokane high school athletic booster club supports, promotes, and encourages the growth and development of the wiaa sanctioned athletic programs at mt. Spokane high school. During the year ended june 30, 2025, the club provided over 45,000 in support for student athletic programs at the school related to athletic equipment, uniforms, travel costs, coaching clinics, and fall and winter athletic activity programs. The club also provided over 8,500 in support for general activities of the high school.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.2%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 84.6%; rating input score 85
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.6%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.2% of revenue deployed · 84.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $54K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.