Mt Lebanon Education Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
251789379
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Canonsburg, PA, USA
Phone
4126260831
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Business and Industry

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$80,599
Expenses
$62,177
Assets
$162,920
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Heather Pessy (President & negotiator)
  • Jason Philips (Vice president & chief negotiator)

People named in this filing

  • Heather Pessy (President & negotiator)
  • Jason Philips (Vice president & chief negotiator)
  • Michael Hladio (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Work collectively to secure and protect member's rights. Mt. Lebanon Education Association helps to meet the district's mission of providing the best education possible for each and every student by offering assistance to students to attend summer enrichment programs. Approximately 60 students were awarded funds to attend programs Various Mt. Lebanon Local Association members attended the following conferences: Collective Bargaining Conferences, Region Leadership Conferences and Gettysburg Summer Leadership Conferences. Approximately 50 members hold elected positions. Mt. Lebanon Education Association continued bargaining for a new contract. There are approximately 440 members in the collective bargain unit.

What it reported doing in 2024

Mt. Lebanon Education Association helps to meet the district's mission of providing the best education possible for each and every student by offering assistance to students to attend summer enrichment programs. Approximately 60 students were awarded funds to attend programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.9%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.62; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 61.6%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24.2% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.