Mt Hood Medical Center Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
930794951
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Phone
5034155600
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,317,704
Expenses
$342,039
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • GRETCHEN M NICHOLS (EX-OFFICIO): $690,161 total reported compensation
  • KATHRYN PANWALA MD (FORMER TRUSTEE): $562,744 total reported compensation
  • MAUREEN A BRADLEY (EX-OFFICIO): $462,793 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mount hood medical center foundation raises funds to support and advance the programs and services of legacy mount hood medical center, with the goal of improving the health of east multnomah county residents.

What it reported doing in 2020

Mount Hood Medical Center Foundation raises funds to support the programs and services of Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center, as it meets the needs of East Multnomah County residents.Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center has served Gresham and the east county since 1912. Among the hospitals comprehensive services are:* Emergency and Intensive care* Cardiac services* Surgery and minimally invasive surgery* Cancer care and radiation oncology, including the Breast Health Center* Family Birth Center* Gastroenterology and Endoscopy servicesIn fiscal year 2021, philanthropic contributions supported programs in these primary areas: Patient Care $311,657Education and Training $7,000Community Benefit & Other Programs$33,139Some of the specific projects funded in this year were as follows: Provided funding to support the hospitals COVID-19 preparedness and response. Provided continuing education scholarships to nurses and other health professionals. Purchased an upper body ergometer exercise machine for cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation patients. Purchased compression garments for lymphedema patients to prevent the return of swelling, allowing patients to regain use of the affected extremity. Provided emergency medications, durable medical equipment, and other health- related supplies to uninsured, under-insured, and low-income patients. Collaborated with Ride Connection to provide transportation for seniors, low- income patients, and patients with disabilities to medical appointments. Supported complementary therapies for cancer patients including nutrition education, exercise, art therapy and yoga classes. Supported child passenger safety seat activities for the community. Supported the care and maintenance of the healing garden.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.7%; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 78.6%; rating input score 79; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 74%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 99.4%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $342K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $690K · 18 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2009 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 17 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.