Mt Baker Planned Parenthood

What it reported doing in 2024

Community relations: the community relations department provides information, support, and training that helps mt. Baker planned parenthood supporters influence public policy and the legislative process. Mbpp works with local, state, and national officials and through issue advocacy and grassroots organizing to make sure that sexual and reproductive health care is recognized as healthcare; improve access to family planning services; improve the availability and accuracy of sex education in public schools; keep abortion safe and legal; and reduce teen pregnancy rates. The program fulfills this work in three specific areas:(continued in schedule o)(1) media/public relations: the goal of the program is to increase understanding of sexual and reproductive health, increase awareness of threats to accessing sexual and reproductive health, and to increase the support for sexual and reproductive health in the area mbpp serves. To do this, mbpp will use traditional media strategies like press releases, letters to the editor, and media advisories. Mbpp will also use a variety of social media platforms and other non-traditional ways to reach people and get the message out.(2) activists/volunteers: the program seeks to foster an active relationship with its volunteers and community activists as well as to expand the database. Mbpp has 81 active volunteers.(3) legislative/policy: mbpp maintains an active relationship with local, state, and federal elected officials. The community relations department is responsible for staying informed of and disseminating information about relevant state and national policy. The program encourages activists to connect with their local, state, and federal elected officials.

Financial Efficiency

• Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
• Program expense ratio: 97.5%; rating input score 98
• Fundraising efficiency: $26.63 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

• Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
• Pay-setting controls: Limited
• Foreign activity oversight: Limited
• Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
• Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
• Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

• Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
• Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
  • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
  • Whistleblower policy: Pass
  • Document-retention policy: Pass
  • CEO compensation review process: Pass
  • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
  • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
  • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
  • Audit committee oversight: Missing
  • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

• Operating margin: -637.8%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
• Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
• Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
• Officer compensation ratio: 0.5%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

• Program expense growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
• Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
• Asset growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings