Mt Angel Developmental Programs

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
930637607
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2010
Forms available
Form 990 2010
Location
Mt Angel, OR, USA
Phone
5038459214
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Group Homes

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,773,654
Expenses
$4,164,159
Assets
$2,975,004
Liabilities
$236,325

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

In environments of respect, trust, and mutual support, all individuals are encouraged to further develop a sense of community as educational, training, and personal growth goals are pursued.

What it reported doing in 2010

The organization provides individualized assessment, training, and support to ensure job performance and to provide direct employment for program participants. Clients are employed in: community businesses - with training and support from the supported employment program and the work activity center, program participants work in jobs at area businesses such as grocery stores, fast food, a retirement center, the benedictine abbey, an intensive nursing facility, and government offices.facility production - the organization engages in light manufacturing and assembly and also subcontracts with businesses to create job opportunities. The medical products division, for instance, assembles and sells admission kits and hygiene kits to hospitals, nursing facilities and penal institutions in Oregon.enclaves - individuals can perform specific group work, supervised by job coaches, at area businesses and industries.custodial services - the organization operates a janitorial business serving customers in marion, clackamas, and polk counties.practical approaches to autism and learning (paal) - paal provides an anxiety free environment through structured teaching and sensory learning. Such an environment promotes the strengths of the individual and encourages communication through cue cards and other forms of non-verbal communication.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 85
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.8%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.5%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $147K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.