Msu Benefits Group Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431744938
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Lees Summit, MO, USA
- Phone
- 8168751919
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Associations (Government)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $43
- Expenses
- $4,797
- Assets
- $78,209
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JUDY MULLINS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROBERT YUST (SECRETARY/TREASURER)
- JUDY MULLINS (PRESIDENT)
- BRIAN HUGGINS (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The consortium maintains a health care and welfare plan for the payment of employee health and disability benefits for Missouri state college and universities. The plan provided benefits through dec. 31, 2004, with all coverages ceasing jan. 1, 2005. However, the plan was responsible for covering all eligible claims incurred in 2004 & submitted for payment by dec. 31, 2005. Any claims submitted after that are not covered by the plan.
What it reported doing in 2017
The consortium maintains a health care and welfare plan for the payment of employee health and disability benefits for Missouri state colleges and universities. The plan provided benefits through december 31, 2004, with all coverages ceasing january 1, 2005. However, the plan was responsible for covering all eligible claims incurred in 2004 & submitted for payment by december 31, 2005. Any claims submitted after that are not covered by the plan.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11,055.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 16.3; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -8.5% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2011 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.