Ms Fiteffect

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
853082095
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Bainbridge, PA, USA
Phone
7176827230
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nerve, Muscle and Bone Diseases

Reported finances

Revenue
$83,310
Expenses
$40,028
Assets
$100,587
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARK MUELLER (PRESIDENT)
  • ROBERT THOMPSON (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAVID HUNT (DIRECTOR)
  • DIXIE KALEY (DIRECTOR)
  • MARK MUELLER (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ms fiteffect is dedicated to improving the quality of life for people who live with multiple sclerosis by working with and teaching them how fitness and proper exercise can change their lives.

What it reported doing in 2024

Ms fiteffect provided a 10 week free training program for 20 individuals with multiple sclerosis which includes a certified trainer who is an ms fitness and wellness specialist, 10 weeks of individualized training sessions with one of our fitness professionals, 10 weeks of gym membership at our host facility and ongoing support and community for people living with ms. Ms fiteffect provided 40 ten week fitness sessions scholarships for individuals with ms. Ms fiteffect hosted a free seminar on yoga excercises and streatching for 21 individuals with ms.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 48
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 73
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 34.3%; rating input score 34
  • Program expense ratio: 71.5%; rating input score 71

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 52%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.51; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 23.5%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 45.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 37.1% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 42.7% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 34.3% of revenue deployed · 71.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $29K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.