Mphs & Mcms Fastpitch Booster Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
871707879
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Forsyth, GA, USA
Phone
4789573266
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Baseball, Softball

Reported finances

Revenue
$50,977
Expenses
$70,982
Assets
$1,300

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEPHANIE CREWS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TAMMY TURNER (TREASURER)
  • STEPHANIE CREWS (PRESIDENT)
  • HEIDI MOON (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mchs & mcms fastpitch booster club's primary purpose it to raise funds to provide financial support for the mchs & mcms fastpitch softball team.

What it reported doing in 2023

During the 2023 mary persons softball season, the mphs & mcms fastpitch booster club inc held fundraisers that included apparel and concession sales to offer financial support to the softball program. We also solicited donations and sponsors by having the players go directly to businesses and donors. These donations and sales went directly to field maintenance and upkeep of the entire softball complex as well as purchased uniforms and travel expenses for away games for 43 players and coaches.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 96.4%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -39.2%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 77.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 46.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -177% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $68K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.