Mpact Ministries Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
455246877
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Garland, TX, USA
Phone
2147232618
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Temporary Housing

Reported finances

Revenue
$40,439
Expenses
$40,278
Assets
$161

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Cynthia Barefield (President, Dir.)

People named in this filing

  • Cynthia Barefield (President, Dir.)
  • Ida Newman (Secretary, Dir.)
  • Carol Canterbury (Treasurer, Dir.)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the organization is to provide presently and previously incarcerated offenders with spiritual, physical and emotional support resulting in productive members of society and reduced recidivism.

What it reported doing in 2017

A) Ministered inside the prisons three times a week (Hutchins State Jail, San Saba Womens Prison); b) Taught/Mentored/Discipleship at Faith Based Transition Aftercare Programs throughout Texas and especially around the DFW Metroplex Area; c) Incarcerated Womens writing ministry that writes/corresponds with monthly letters of encouragement/devotionals and Bible Studies with over 650 women in the Texas/US Prisons and every woman incarcerated in Belize C.A. (English and Spanish); d) Developed program for Mpact Ministries Womens Aftercare (housing) program in preparation of acquiring a facility to house women coming out of prison as it aligned with our bylaws and strategic long-range plans; e) 2 Mission trips to Uganda, Africa where we, preached, taught, baptized in a 6-day Crusade, ministered in the hospitals, Youth Prison facility, and adult Prison. Constructed the first of two multipurpose buildings (Church, Bible School, Orphanage) at the Kaliro Site.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 82.3%; rating input score 82

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.4%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82% of revenue deployed · 82.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $33K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.