Mozaic Academy

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
993183204
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Naperville, IL, USA
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development – Religious Leadership

Reported finances

Revenue
$45,931
Expenses
$45,000
Assets
$931

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Umair Haseeb (Co-Foudner)
  • Sherif Aly (Co-Founder)
  • Fahad Qureshi (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mozaics primary exempt purpose is to foster community connection and cultural enrichment through inclusive events arts and educational programs. We create spaces for diverse communities to gather celebrate creativity and support social cohesion through lectures workshops and cultural initiatives.

What it reported doing in 2024

Mozaic organized and hosted educational classes and community retreats focused on cultural artistic and spiritual development.These programs provided opportunities for participants to learn reflect and connect in inclusive spaces that promote creativity personal growth and community building.During the year Mozaic held multiple in-person and online sessions serving over [insert approximate number e.g. 300 participants] and engaging local partners instructors and volunteers to deliver impactful programming aligned with its mission.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.1%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 88.9%; rating input score 89

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.1% of revenue deployed · 88.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $40K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.