Moving Beyond Cancer Collaborative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
852317602
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Phone
5127635463
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Health Support Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$133,688
Expenses
$141,709
Assets
$23,068

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Archie Imperial (Vice President)
  • Danyelle Weatherford (Vice President)
  • Penelop DeCou (Vice President)
  • Carolyn Kenny (President)

People named in this filing

  • Mari Galle (Executive Dir.)
  • Kathryn Hudson (Treasurer)
  • Archie Imperial (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission at Moving Beyond Cancer Collaborative is to provide accessible and affordable integrative oncology health and wellness services that encourage sustainable balance within the mind, body, and spirit for all individuals affected by a cancer diagnosis. Our philosophy is that integrative oncology health and wellness services, educational seminars, and fitness classes should be available to all individuals affected by cancer regardless of ability to pay. Our intention is to move individuals through and beyond cancer in a manner that is dignified, compassionate, and empowering.

What it reported doing in 2025

Section 509a2 - a public charity which receives substantial revenues from a combination of contributions, membership fees, and gross receipts from activities that further its exempt purpose.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 59.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 35.9% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.