Movimiento Cursillios De Cristianda Long Island Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
862947723
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Baldwin, NY, USA
Phone
5167613683
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$134,211
Expenses
$134,245
Assets
$38,255
Liabilities
$1,200

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MIGUEL ALFARO (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MIGUEL ALFARO (PRESIDENT)
  • JESUS GUZMAN (SECRETARY)
  • ANA ROSARIO (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation is a religious not-for-profit entity, organized to share the good news of the love of god to all people. The corporation provided retreats (small courses known as cursillios) to help guide people to experience god's love, and to help them have a personal encounter with themselves, christ and others. The corporation also provides spiritual advisement to individuals in need, especially to those who have lost their way. The corporation also provides spiritual advisement to help provide a vital relationship with christ in accordance with the traditions of the christian, through mission outreach, leadership and discipleship, and assist these individuals in their spiritual, personal and community development.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization is a lay movement of the catholic church that originated in spain around 1944. The movememnt expanded to all of the countries around the world where catholic churches were located. The organization serves to share, guide, advise and strengthen one's spiritual journey with jesus christ our savior in accordance with christian faith and tradition. It achieves this by being faithful to the lay movement's mentality, essence and true purpose and phases of its method. The activity was conducted by lay individuals, as supervised by an eventual executive director, subject to ther approval of the board of directors. The activity was conducted in the form of various retreats located in nassau county, New York and suffolk county, New York. The total amount of time that was allocated to the activity by the organization was 100 percent. Funding for the activity was through contributions, donations and grants.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 96.7%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 96.7%; rating input score 97
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 57.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 36.6% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 96.7% of revenue deployed · 96.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $130K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.