Movement Strategy Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201037643
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Oakland, CA, USA
Phone
+1 510 444-0640
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$21,788,256
Expenses
$35,951,982
Assets
$36,420,573
Liabilities
$5,191,310

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CARLA DARTIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • CARLA DARTIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $250,932 total reported compensation
  • TENESHA DUNCAN (OCC PROJECT DIRECTOR): $228,236 total reported compensation
  • TAJ JAMES (PROJ. DIR/VICE CHAIR, CO-FOUNDER): $201,624 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Movement Strategy Center (MSC) supports movements and organizations working to build a just, equitable, and sustainable world. We provide strategic advising, capacity building, and philanthropic advising to advance racial, economic, and climate justice.

What it reported doing in 2024

At movement strategy center (msc), we remain committed to supporting mission-driven organizations and initiatives through a comprehensive and collaborative approach. Our key program areas, including foundation regranting, special interest and community advised funds, donor advised fund (daf) programs, capacity building, communications, strategic advisory services, and fiscally sponsored projects (fsps), are designed to provide administrative, financial, and programmatic support to organizations working to address a range of social, economic, and environmental challenges.msc works with a broad network of community-based leaders and organizations. Our staff and board bring a range of professional and lived experiences that inform our work and help ensure alignment with the populations and communities served. Through our programs, we aim to strengthen organizational capacity, expand access to funding resources, and promote effective and responsible grantmaking practices.movement infrastructure and innovation center (miic)miic serves as an administrative and operational hub supporting msc's fiscally sponsored projects and partner organizations. Miic provides fiscal oversight, compliance, and administrative services, enabling partners to focus on program implementation. Miic also offers consulting and program design services to support organizational development and sector-wide effectiveness.movement strategy network (msn)msn is a network of partner organizations that collaborate on shared programmatic goals. Msc supports msn partners through general operating support, capacity-building services, and coordination efforts to enhance collaboration and long-term sustainability.regranting servicesmsc administers regranting programs that distribute funds to eligible organizations in accordance with donor intent and applicable regulations. These programs are designed to increase access to funding for community-based organizations and to support projects addressing identified community needs.special interest and community advised fundsthese funds support targeted grantmaking initiatives focused on specific issue areas or communities. Msc facilitates grantmaking processes that incorporate input from advisors and stakeholders to inform funding decisions, consistent with applicable guidelines and donor restrictions.donor advised fund (daf) programmsc administers donor advised funds that allow donors to recommend grants to qualified charitable organizations. The program encourages timely and effective distribution of charitable funds in alignment with donor intent and IRS requirements.intermediary fund cohort participationmsc participates in collaborative initiatives with peer organizations to develop resources and best practices for intermediary grantmaking and fiscal sponsorship. Msc provides financial management, compliance support, and administrative services to fiscally sponsored projects to ensure adherence to applicable laws and regulations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 61% for direct work, and 39% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 71
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $25.71 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Pass
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 96.5%; rating input score 96; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -65%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $31.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $251K · 16 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.4M reported
  • Consistency: 40 of 42 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 154 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 143 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.