Move a Child Higher Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 954560255
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Chatsworth, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8187002971
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,584
- Expenses
- $41,294
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- BRYAN MCQUEENEY (Executive Dir.)
- Matt Hourihan (Secretary)
- Kris koontz (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Move a child higher (mach 1) leads to greater abilities by providing equineassisted activities and horsemanship. This mission statement is desighned to helprideres with disabilities improve their physical abilities and emotional health
What it reported doing in 2023
Mach 1 served riders with disabilities. The program serves riders with variousdisabilities including autism, dow syndrome, angelman's diporder, cp, neurological disorders, amputees, dystonia, accident involvements, blindness, deafness, and others. Activities include: handling and riding horses to increasebody awareness/control and individual and group games for skill learning/socialinteraction.as a path intl (professional association of therapeutic horsemanship international)premier accredited center (mach1) abides by the north american riding for thehandicapped association, inc. Standards.the purpose of path intl accreditation is to provide a process of evaluation thatrecognizes a center's program as meeting basic standards for both health and safetyto promote the well being of all participants and equines.mach 1 serves riders with disabilities mostly in pasadena, san gabriel valley area; however we are now able to serve more clients from the surrounding areas.in the past year our facilities have been upgraded to our own center. We now offerunmounted horsemanship lessons and summer and winter camp. We also serve incoordination with several law enforcement and other civic organizations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 73% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 26.3%; rating input score 26
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1,052.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -10.6% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11.1% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -16.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 26.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.