Mourning Family Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 651075983
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Miami, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3054760095
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $369,407
- Expenses
- $213,234
- Assets
- $5,632,446
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
32 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TINA BROWN (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- TINA BROWN (CEO): $210,956 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mourning family foundation, a non-profit organization founded by alonzo and tracy mourning, provides a multitude of opportunities to enhance the lives of children and families in the south Florida community through advocacy,(continued on schedule o)
What it reported doing in 2024
Education and enrichment services. Presently, we provide funding to the overtown youth center and honey shine who are currently serving over 1200 students from 2nd grade to age 25, who reside in south Florida and attend schools in the area.the oyc's program services continue to be based on four highly effective program components: the relationship model: oyc's method of service delivery. Through it, employees establish meaningful relationships with youth and their families based on mutual respect.the culture of success: the creation of a powerful environment where interactions are positive and respectful, with high expectations for all members of the culture and facilitate the success of all participants.comprehensive approach: an approach, which allows oyc to service the "whole child", and crosses all of the environments. To do this, oyc develops partnerships with parents, schools, and community organizations and engages in the constant provision of services (24 hour case management, in school/after school services and summer program).continuum of service: providing services from second grade to age 25 to guide them through the phases of their psychological development and improve their life's trajectory. Oyc monitorsstudents' progress to ensure they graduate from high school and are then enrolled in college, a vocational school or gainfully employed.whole school expansion: oyc has also expanded its footprint in the overtown community; we have decided to adopt the whole school expansion model in a direct partnership with miami dade county public schools and jose de diego middle school. Our goal is to work with the school district to remain on the continuum of increased graduation rates, increased attendance and parent participation and ultimately produce positive contributing citizens in the overtown community. Through this partnership and our current programming at oyc and honey shine, we are now servicing over 700 youth in south Florida.honey shine is made up of two programming elements: the aspire to shine workshops offered to the girls in the program, which are affectionately called 'honey bugs', address life-skill lessons and educational experiences. Camp honey shine allows for the continuation of programming beyond the workshops. The camp provides the girls with the opportunity to build on cognitive, social, physical skills, values, and character building that allows them to strive for success. Combined, oyc and honey shine strive to work with these young people while providing them with the necessary resources and tools to succeed and to achieve the ultimate goal of graduating from high school and attending college or some form of higher education.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 1
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 92
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.1%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0.1%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.73 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 93.9%; rating input score 94; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42.3%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 26.41; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.5% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0.1% of revenue deployed · 0.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 31 of 33 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $296 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $211K · 32 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.