Mountain Metro Ambucs

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
582214222
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Lawton, OK, USA
Phone
5805950884
Rating
58
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$44,666
Expenses
$54,490
Assets
$30,310

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PRISCILLA SACKS (PRESIDENT)
  • KIRSTEN FARMER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTINE JEWELL (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • PRISCILLA SACKS (PRESIDENT)
  • KIRSTEN FARMER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ANGELA FREMIN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Creating independence for people with disabilities

What it reported doing in 2019

National living endeowmwnt-monies sent to national organization forscholarships to therapists. Local scholarships to therapists.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 47
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 50.3%; rating input score 50
  • Program expense ratio: 41.2%; rating input score 41

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -22%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -22.2% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -20.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 50.3% of revenue deployed · 41.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $22K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.