Mountain Harvest Creative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
841610325
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Paonia, CO, USA
Phone
9707789072
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$65,456
Expenses
$55,924
Assets
$16,637
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Tom Backhus (President)

People named in this filing

  • Tom Backhus (President)
  • Dale Cecil (Treasurer)
  • Holly Bidle (Board Memeber)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Charitable work

What it reported doing in 2021

Through a harvest celebration, we provide a venue for multiple nonprofit organizations to raise funds. In 2021, eight nonprofits benefited from the festival. Mountain Harvest Festival also boosts the economy of our rural area by promoting the area's agritourism creative population, and recreation. Over 100 business have their most profitable week of the year, and many visitors return.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.2%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 83.4%; rating input score 83

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14.6%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 23.2%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.2% of revenue deployed · 83.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $47K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2017 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.