Mount Zion Christian Retreat Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464133056
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Pipe Creek, TX, USA
Phone
8305104340
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$47,361
Expenses
$57,891
Assets
$31,154
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DOUGLAS MARKS (CHAIRMAN)
  • MIKE MORRISON (SECRETARY)
  • TIM DUFF (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mount zion christian retreat center inc is organized upon the all-encompassing values of the catholic christian religion. It strives to ensure that all ministry responsibilities are fulfilled according to biblical principles and strives to initiate ministries on behalf of the retreat center, and pro-actively works to inspire, resource, and strengthen local retreat center ministries. It accomplishes these values in several ways. It provides use of its facilities to tax-exempt church fellowships free of charge and rents the facilities for other functions. It also holds a youth camp for children that teaches, encourages, witnesses, and equips the youth who join to become more like christ through christ-centered relationships.

What it reported doing in 2014

Mount zion christian retreat center inc provides services to youth in the form of a summer camp. The organization is to establish and operate a ministry that will provide a christian ministry outreach that is committed to sharing our faith in god to individuals. This outreach includes teaching, encouraging, witnessing, and equipping every man, woman, boy, and girl to become more like christ through christ-centered relationships.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -22.2%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.