Mount Pleasant Village Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
473338438
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2527213784
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Supportive Housing for Older Adults

Reported finances

Revenue
$169,766
Expenses
$126,635
Assets
$69,597
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Fred ORegan (Vice President)
  • Tess Amolsch (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Robin Sandenburg (Presidant)
  • Fred ORegan (Vice President)
  • Eugene Hamory (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A community network of support services provided by volunteers, enabling aging and disabled residents of Mount Pleasant to remain independent and to be active in the Mount Pleasant Community.

What it reported doing in 2025

Village volunteers worked to make our community a better place for all Mount Pleasant residents. Activities include: completing the purchase and installation of a camera network along Mt. Pleasant St, planting native plants in tree boxes throughout our community, conducting events to bring the diverse elements of the community together such as a Gay Pride Celebration, Music on the Plaza, a Winter Holiday Festival. Mulching tree boxes, Providing volunteer and financial support to Stoddard Baptist Nursing Home, Clinica Del Pueblo, and Bancroft and Sacred Heart schools. Financing and conducting a comprehensive housing study. Volunteers participated in a monthly community clean up effort, and held events such as Meet the Street dinners to support local businesses.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 74% for direct work, and 26% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.4%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 98.4%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 25.4%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 27.9% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.4% of revenue deployed · 98.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $125K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.