Mount Pleasant Christian School

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752781316
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Mount Pleasant, TX, USA
Phone
9035771550
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$147,750
Expenses
$130,762
Assets
$195,849

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JANET WOODS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TONY MCNATT (HEADMASTER)
  • JANET WOODS (PRESIDENT)
  • CAREN HODGES (SECRETARY/TR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the mt pleasant christian school is to educate children from prekindergarten to twelth grade. The goal is to not only have successful graduates who contribute in meaningful ways to the community, but also to carry the principles of a christ centered life with them into adulthood. Graduates may go on to college or independent employment. Students' courses of study include core curriculum subjects: math, english language arts, literature, and science. Junior high and senior high school students may choose from other electives which include foreign language, speech and drama, typing, computer, and fine arts. All students further their christian education with courses on the bible.

What it reported doing in 2024

The purpose of the mt pleasant christian school is to educate children in a christian environment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.9%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 84.6%; rating input score 85

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.5%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.5; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.5%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 74.9% of revenue deployed · 84.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $111K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.