Mount Carmel Youth Ranch
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841404636
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2011
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011
- Location
- Powell, WY, USA
- Phone
- 3076453322
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Group Homes
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $850,166
- Expenses
- $790,496
- Assets
- $583,917
- Liabilities
- $84,024
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mtc is organized to help at-risk youth struggling with substance abuse and other self-destructive behaviors, restore their family relationships, and foster strong moral and work ethics that mature the adolescents into morally conscious self-disciplined young men ready to transition into a healthy and productive adulthood.
What it reported doing in 2011
Catholic therapeutic youth ranch and school. Mtc operates a year-round catholic residential youth ranch program and school located on a working cattle ranch in powell, Wyoming. During the 2 to 12 month stay, the youth matriculate through an intensive four-phase curriculum that combines the daily life and work activities of a traditional ranch cowboy with daily classroom learning, bible studies, physical education, and life skills and vocational training opportunities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $778K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $19K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.