Motivate Our Minds Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
351734264
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Muncie, IN, USA
Phone
7652891990
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$289,024
Expenses
$499,853
Assets
$856,297
Liabilities
$18,521

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BETH QUARLES (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DENISE MILLBEN-WILLIAMS (EXECUTIVE DI): $69,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Educating children and families to grow and flourish.

What it reported doing in 2024

With expectations as our foundation, the motivate our minds program provides students with the premier education enrichment program that combines adaptive technologies with intensive direct instruction, provided by highly qualified teachers. In the last three years, we have undertaken a tremendous effort to better document the rate of success students are having in the classroom. To those ends, we have been able to monitor student progress via the muncie community schools parent portal, and we are able to track reading and math proficiency within the star reading and star math programs. Within the first semester of using the star reading and star math programs, our students showed an average gain of more than one whole school year. For the students that enroll, we are able to demostrate clear connections to the math and reading objectives that are being mastered on a daily and quarterly basis. There are other extended-school programs in muncie and Delaware county. While each of these organizations is able to represent a specialized area of expertise, motivate our minds provides a comprehensive collection of benefits to families. Motivate our minds employs certified classroom faculty and provides individualized learning controls, via accelerated math and reading programs. By requiring families to share their student's muncie community schools parent portal login, our faculty are able to manage academic progress in real time which adds another level of individualized attention. The history, facilities, tutor support, and reputation of motivate our minds all contribute to a building culture that is not always seen in other programs around the community and allows the teachers to deliver high quality instruction. We can absolutely replicate and expand success, and poverty does not have to mean low achievement and expectations. A support network is fundamental to student success, and so motivate our minds has developed new collaborations while continuing to nurture our existing partners. Additionally, to support the continued learning of students during summer months, the growing entrepreneurs program was created. Over the course of three academic semesters each year, including the summer, motivate our minds has served an average of 60 students in each session. Over 160 students were served during the last year. Over 90% of motivate our minds' families receive at least some form of tuition assistance, relative to their household income and ability to pay. Our sample size for measurement is not as large as we would like at this point, but we are committed to growing our multiple year retention rates.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 98.1%; rating input score 98
  • Program expense ratio: 56.6%; rating input score 57
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -72.9%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.71; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.8%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 98.1% of revenue deployed · 56.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $283K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $69K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.