Mothership Fleet Cooperative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
912017715
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Bothell, WA, USA
Phone
4254446816
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Agricultural Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$63,261
Expenses
$123,855
Assets
$21,770

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • John Henderschedt (Dir, President)

People named in this filing

  • Chris Petersen (Director)
  • Mark Franklin (Director)
  • Gunnar Ildhuso JR (Dir, Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote orderly and efficient harvest of Pollock, minimization of non-targetspecies bycatch, and responsible management of certain fisheries off Alaska through member agreement and research.

What it reported doing in 2024

To promote, through the mutual cooperation of its members, the intelligent andorderly harvest of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Pollock directed fishing allowance for the Mothership sector that is allocated to members; reduce waste and improve resource utilization in these fisheries; reduce the incidental catch of non-target species in the fisheries; to promote the adoption and continued support of resource utilization and conservation agreements and management policies with these objectives; to attend north pacific fishery management council meetings from time to time and to summarize and disseminate information regarding the same; and to facilitate scientific research and publication concerning North Pacific fishing issues, particularly those related to the commercial fisheries of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Island areas.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -95.8%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.