Mothers' Milk Bank California

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770131926
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Jose, CA, USA
Phone
4089884550
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,479,793
Expenses
$5,686,168
Assets
$4,746,347
Liabilities
$697,292

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNIFER BENITO-KOWALSKI (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JENNIFER BENITO-KOWALSKI (CEO): $261,122 total reported compensation
  • CU HO (OPERATIONS DIRECTOR): $155,621 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mothers' milk bank California (mmb) is a leading nonprofit dedicated to providing screened, donated human milk to babies in need. Mmb collects, pasteurizes, and distributes safe human milk to hospitals and families, ensuring essential nutrition for infants.

What it reported doing in 2024

Mothers' milk bank California collects excess breast milk from volunteer breastfeeding mothers, stores the breast milk for optimal nutritional value, processes the breast milk to remove pathogens that may cause illness, and distributes the donor human milk to hospitals and families. As a charter member of the human milk banking association of north america (hmbana) and an accredited hmbana milk bank, the organization follows rigorous standards for the safe processing and distribution of donor human milk - standards that serve as the basis of operation for all milk banking organizations. Mothers' milk bank California is also licensed as a tissue bank in California and Maryland and registered with the federal food and drug administration (fda). The organization hosts virtual and in-person milk and donor drives throughout the year, enabling community partners to promote milk donations and providing donors the convenience of donating either from home or by dropping off the milk at one of our centers. With 9 milk collection centers, the organization also offers additional services, including breastfeeding support and resources for all, wic support, and hospital-based services tailored to the needs of different communities. In 2024, mothers' milk bank California celebrated 50 years of service, marking a significant milestone in its mission to support infants in need. As part of this celebration, the organization rebranded by adding "California" to its name to highlight both its legacy and the service area across the state. The organization also expanded its marketing, communications, and public relations efforts, boosting awareness of the milk bank's work. Additionally, the organization's existing services support families across California and throughout the united states, ensuring that babies in need of donor human milk have access to it no matter where they live. Mothers' milk bank California focused on increasing its processing and pasteurizing capacity to meet the growing demand for donor human milk. The organization worked with 1,686 approved donors and 140 hospitals, distributing nearly 1.34 million ounces of pasteurized donor human milk (pdhm). This included approximately 826,000 ounces for inpatient use and about 521,000 ounces for outpatient use. On average, the organization dispensed 112,000 ounces of pdhm each month to meet both inpatient and outpatient needs. This collaborative effort reflects the organization's strong commitment to supporting infants in need and showcases the community's dedication to making a lasting impact.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.9%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 80.2%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.2%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.83; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.3%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.9% of revenue deployed · 80.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $261K · 14 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $579K reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.