Mote Marine Laboratory & Aquarium

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
590756643
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Jun 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Sarasota, FL, US
Phone
941-388-4441
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$83,003,369
Expenses
$44,868,970
Assets
$239,005,200
Liabilities
$58,417,204

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

38 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL P CROSBY PHD (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • MICHAEL MOORE (SPECIAL ASST TO PRESIDENT)
  • KEVIN COOPER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • RICHARD PIERCE (ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DANIEL BEBAK (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DEBORAH ALLEN SCHULTZ (CFO & VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHAEL P CROSBY PHD (PRESIDENT & CEO): $491,278 total reported compensation
  • MICHAEL MOORE (SPECIAL ASST TO PRESIDENT): $227,060 total reported compensation
  • DEMIAN CHAPMAN (SR. SCIENTIST): $192,189 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are scientists, educators and stewards committed to the oceans and all those who depend on them. Our mission is the advancement of marine and environmental sciences leading to new discoveries, revitalization, sustainability and greater public understanding of our oceans through innovative research, education and outreach.

What it reported doing in 2024

Protect our reefsflorida's coral reef is the third-largest barrier coral reef system in the world. It provides essential ecological services, protects coastlines from major storm impacts and is crucial to Florida's economy, with an asset value of $8.5 billion.this natural treasure has declined drastically over the past few decades due to major coral disease outbreaks, local to regional human impacts, heat-driven coral bleaching, and long-term climate change that is stressing corals in Florida and around the world.mote marine laboratory's protect our reefs program focuses on addressing these and other challenges by supporting coral reef research, restoration, conservation and education in Florida. The protect our reefs (por) specialty license plate was approved by the Florida legislature in july 2003 and is available to Florida-licensed drivers. Each plate sale provides $25 for reef research, restoration, conservation and education in Florida, including a special protect our reefs grants program. 37.5% of revenues support grants and an additional 37.5% of revenues supports mote's coral reef research and restoration. In general, por grant priorities are similar to those outlined by a number of federal and state agencies, and research organizations, along with various governmental, local community and non-profit advisory groups, with respect to coral reef research and other related coral reef program priorities. Because of the need to strategically focus the por plate's limited resources on critical challenges coral reef ecosystems are currently facing, priority for funding in all categories of por proposals (research, education and conservation) will be on coral reef restoration projects, including the research of new restoration methods that further the enhancement of coral genetic diversity and resiliency in the restoration of coral reef ecosystems. Education and public outreach proposals directly related to science-based restoration of coral reef ecosystems will also be considered. Other quality proposals will be given careful consideration, but the priority focus will be on projects that significantly enhance the capabilities of coral reef ecosystem resource managers to more effectively use science-based information in promoting and implementing restoration and long-term sustainable use of these ecosystems. Priority will be given to projects whose deliverables associated are clearly defined and aligned with coral reef restoration actions. The por will accept creative proposals that address novel coral reef restoration ideas and concepts that may require initial support to test their merit. The por encourages scientists that meet the "young-investigator" criteria to note that on their applications. Membershipwith more than 11,000 mote members, fy2025 revenues remained strong at over $1.26 million. Annual memberships continue to provide unrestricted funds that are allocated to where the need is greatest; providing support for mote's overall mission of marine research, conservation and education. Membership levels begin at $100 for an individual and rise to $1,000 for a party of 10. Membership benefits include unrestricted visits to mote aquarium; discounts in the aquarium gift shops and virtual reality experiences, free member-only events; discounts on education programs, camps and experiences, special pricing and early bird ticket sales to mote special events and free and discounted admissions to more than 100 reciprocal zoos, aquariums and gardens across the united states. For a complete list of membership levels, benefits and opportunities, please visit mote.org/membership.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 88
  • Accountability: 98
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 42.8%; rating input score 43
  • Program expense ratio: 78.6%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $21.42 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 98.1%; rating input score 98; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 96.7%; rating input score 97; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 45.9%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.33; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.6%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 42.8% of revenue deployed · 78.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 29 of 30 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $35.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $491K · 38 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1.6M reported
  • Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.